blogs

Search for resources
Enter search keyword(s):  *mandatory
You can further refine your search using the options below:

July 19, 2008

The Organizational Crisis

Filed under: General — edwinweaver @ 5:07 pm
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

The Organizational Crisis
Students Lacking the Skills to Organize
By Dr. Edwin C. Weaver
www.we-develop-leaders.com
www.uniqueleaders.org

Johnny comes into class, he is a likeable boy, pays attention, but his grades are poor. The teacher asks for the homework from last night. Johnny rummages through his backpack and after a few minutes, pulls out a crumpled piece of paper or answers that he can not find the homework or worse, that he did not do it.

We look at the crumpled paper and decide that Johnny does not care about the subject. In the case of the missing homework, sometimes we do not believe that he did the homework. If Johnny said that he did not do it, we are really upset and believe that he is lazy. However, all of these assumptions may be wrong. We may have a more serious problem which will affect Johnny’s entire life.

Many children today suffer from the lack of study skills and organizational methods. To compound this problem, many teachers do not teach students how to be organized or to study; it is not part of the curriculum. We assume that the child should come to school with these abilities.

When you and I were children, one of our parents was usually in the house, normally Mom. Mom was always on our back; pick up your clothes, put that back where you found it, straighten your room, straighten your books, you have 15 minutes to finish your homework, you can’t go out until your room is clean, the yard better be cleaned before I get back, etc. Mom was teaching us how to organize things. However the children today do not have that benefit, the norm is that both parents work and the child is alone or with siblings.

Children need that quality time with the parents. They need to be instructed in what to do, how to do it and when to do it. The children need to be nurtured, especially if you want the children to develop good study skills and organizational methods (Israel and Bealieu, 2001).

Without guidance the child will become increasing disorganized, with the result of failing on tests and perhaps the year. This in turn affects the child’s self-esteem and adds a great deal of stress to the child’s life (Williamson, 1997), which starts a vicious cycle of failure and often the child quits school and enters the workforce.

Entering the workforce is no advantage. Due to the lack of skills and education the person is ill-prepared and can experience many difficulties in his/her life. If the employer does not see that the person has been taught the basic skills, the person will not be hired (Hanson, 1995). As educators, we need to step up and help these children before it is too late.

Remember, “children are not alike in their ability to be organized. Some children have better organizational skills than others” (Gallagher, 2003, para. 3). Therefore we can not judge all children the same. We must help them to see and experience an organized life style. We must explain to them what organization means and teach them how to organize their time, books, etc.

This is not an easy task! Even if the parents are helpful, the child has a multitude of choices before him/her everyday. Did you realize that the average child spend only a half an hour in ‘meaningful’ conversation with his/her parents each week. What does the child do with the other hours? Many of our students choose technology, of which television is one example. Television and other technologies do not require organization; in fact they discourage it (Gale, 2006).

At one time you had to plan what you wanted to watch. Today, with cable, VCRs, DVDs, etc, there is no need to plan. You watch what you want when you want to. Planning and organizing has been lost. This is not the only consequence of technology.

Student spends an average of 28 hours per week in front of either the TV or computer verses 5.6 hours for homework. The amount of time participating in interaction with others or participating in events which will foster and reinforce organizational habits, such as reading, writing, cleaning or conversing, is seriously hampered. This dedication to the TV or computer leads to lower academic achievement and poor study and organizational skills. The home and technology are not the only culprits; we as teacher have some blame.

Often, we believe that we are doing our jobs correctly when we announce the assignment dates and important facts in the class. We assume that the student is able to understand, record, organize and recall the information at a future time. Later, like with our example Johnny, the assignment does not appear or is it not as we asked. We are disappointed and do not understand what happen. We say the child is not trying or that they child does nothing in class. We tell the parents that the child has the mental and physical capacity to perform the task, but he/she does not want to work; however, poor organizational skills have prevented them from completing such a task (Bryan & Burstein, 2004). So what can we do?

Lack of organization covers all grade levels. There is no one particular magic grade where you can change the student. We must devise plans for all grades. Students need different skills at different levels, grades or ages. Providing models and guidance can help.

Teachers can provide a set-up for how the inside of a school desk should look, monitor work areas, and provide a clean-up time at the end of each class, day, or week (Ito, 1996). Keep a clean classroom. When students see that the area is clean and organized, they start to model what they see. It seems that all research suggests that teachers need to provide students with time to make sure that their personal space at school is organized (Bakunas & Holley, 2001). Yet, we need to go further.

We need to explain what organization is, means and how to be organized. Just having the models will help, but the student needs more guidance and direction. Explain how to organize time, items and choices. Teaching the students how to organize will increase the academic achievement and produce a better student. Research demonstrates that intervention will raise test and homework scores (Bryan & Burstein, 2004).

We have many tools at our disposal; require the students to use assignment books, encourage organization of desk and or lockers and binders. With the binders, make sure you help the student to understand how to divide and organize the binder.

Using a daily agenda or planner will help. Have the students keep track of important items, events, tests, assignments or times. Once they are keeping these in the planner, have the students set a priority to each item. Be sure that as they complete items, they also check them off and the teacher should check the student’s planners regularly (Bakunas & Holley, 2001).

Remember to provide positive feedback for the students. By providing a positive interaction with the student, the teacher will be boosting the student’s self-esteem, which will lead to higher morale, and in turn, higher achievement (Wigley, 2004) and that is what we, as teachers, are aiming for; high scores and motivated learners.

If the school permits, add a life skills class to the schedule. Give the students one hour per week to learn about study skills, organizational skills, active listening, note taking and other life skills. Students should be directly taught study skills, from planning to actual location of studying. Students should make a list of steps or procedures at the end of every day. Providing classes in these skills proves beneficial (Wigley, 2004).

This article is written primarily fro teacher in formal education. However, all that is equally applicable to non-formal settings, such as ESL classrooms. In fact, teachers in the ESL classes run into these problems more than teachers in formal education.

It may be wise and even profitable for language institutes to add classes in these life skills. They may want to require that student have the basic skills and if not the student must fist attend the training sessions.

References:

Bakunas, B., & Holley, W. (2001). Teaching organizational skills. Clearing House, 74 (3) 151-155.
Bryan, T., & Sullivan-Burstein, K. (2004). Improving homework completion and academic performance: Lessons from special education. Theory into Practice, 43 (3) 213-220.
Gale, T. (2006). Michael Ramsay and James Barton biography. Retrieved March 27, 2007 from http://www.notablebiographies.com/news/Ow-Sh/Ramsay-Michael-and- Barton-James.html.
Gallagher, R. (2003). Organizational skills for school success. The Parent Letter,1(3), Retrieved November 30, 2006, from http://www.aboutourkids.org.
Hanson, B. (1995). Getting to know you: Multi-year teaching. Educational Leadership, 53 (3).
Isreal, G.D., & Beaulieu, L.J. (2001). The influence of family and community social capital on educational achievement. Rural Sociology, 66 (1). 43-68.
Ito, C. (1996). I think I did it, but I can’t find it: Assisting students who lack organizational skills. Williamsburg, VA: Training and Technical Assistance Center at the College of William and Mary, Retrieved November 30, 2006, from http://www.wm.edu/ttac/articles/learning/orgskills.html.
Wigley, S.C. (2004).Assessment of morale in further education students studying for A-level examinations. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28 (4), 423-434.
Williamson, R.D. (1997). Help me organize. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33 (1) 36-40.

©2005 Unique Leaders www.we-develop-leaders.com

July 16, 2008

Watch The Big Idea on CNBC tonight

Filed under: General — Cindy Martin @ 5:56 pm
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

I will be on The Big Idea tonight (Mon., June 16) with Donny Deutsch, CNBC, asking a web cam question about winning. Please watch and check us out on their web site http://www.cnbc.com/ :)

cindy@cashforcreations.com

July 14, 2008

Great Methods - Poor Results

Filed under: General — edwinweaver @ 12:08 pm
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

Great Methods - Poor Results
Dr. Edwin Weaver
Unique Leaders Educational Leadership
www.we-develop-leaders.com
www.uniqueleaders.org
May 25, 2008

For years the educational world has been talking about Formative Assessment. It has been more than 100 years since Formative Assessment was first researched. Since that time, reams of research have proven its effectiveness, yet we appear to be no closer to solving many of the educational problems which exist.

Governments around the world have instituted standards based educational systems. They have mandated Formative Assessment for all school, yet many students continue to fail. Are the standards wrong? Is Formative Assessment wrong? I would have to answer a resounding no to both of these questions. The answer is much closer to home.

You can have the best system, the best methods, however if the people utilizing these systems, these methods do not truly believe in the system, its benefits or themselves, the system and/or methods will fail. Borko, Mayfield, Marion, Flexer, & Cumbo, 1997 and Shepard, in 2000 found that the belief system and the practices of teachers need to be changed in order for Formative Assessment to function properly.

For more than twenty years I have worked in education and training as a teacher, school principal, teacher trainer and corporate trainer. I have been in charge of implementing Formative Assessment in schools around the world. I have seen the implementation of Formative Assessment produce great success and great failure.

In an international school where I was the principal, everyone admitted that the school needed a change. In some subjects, 87% of the students were failing. In addition, there were incredible discipline problems (due to the lack of learning opportunities).

I met with the directors and proposed implementing Formative Assessment. I presented the successes which I had experienced in other institutes when Formative Assessment was used for educating the students. The directors were unanimously in agreement that the school should change and implement Formative Assessment to improve the level of education and change the attitudes of the students.

The teachers were informed of the change and those who wished to stay and be a part of the new system where given training in Formative Assessment. Though a person is trained, if they do not thoroughly believe in the training and/or the results of the training, they will not produce the desired results.

We trained teachers to use Formative Assessment, however many did not apply Formative Assessment in the classroom. Others applied the system when they were being observed, but when no one was watching they went back to old style of teaching.

At the end of the first 10 week period when the report cards were process, it was easy to identify the teachers who were not using Formative assessment. Failure rates were as high as 47% of the class for the teachers who were not utilizing Formative Assessment. In the other classes the failure rate was 0% to 3%. The difference was obvious, but the reasons were not.

We started interviewing the teachers to find the reasons for the high failure rates. We also interviewed the successful teachers and compared their answers to questions about Formative Assessment to the answers given by teachers with high failure rates. Upon examining the answers, we learned that the successful teachers had a very different attitude towards Formative Assessment. Even the teachers who used what appeared to be Formative Assessment in their classes and who had high failure rates answered differently than those who were 100% behind Formative Assessment. The attitude and/or belief system kept the teachers from applying Formative Assessment properly.

There was no one group of teachers (old, young, new) which disbelieved, however those teachers who had been in the school for 10 to 15 years made up the highest percentage. The smallest percentage was from recently graduated teachers. They appeared more open to learn something new or to learn a different way of teaching.

We began working harder with the group of unbelievers. Again the hardest group to convince was the group of teachers who had been teaching the longest. They believed that their ways had worked for the last 15 to 20 years; therefore there was no need to change.

They admitted that they were not getting the results needed or required, but no one had complained before and these were the results they had obtained for 10 to 15 years. Furthermore, they believed that the failure rate was due to the students which they were teaching. We showed them the results of the teachers who were correctly using Formative Assessment.

They agreed that these teachers were enjoying a great success with their students. However, they felt that this group of students performed better. We examined school records and found students who had been taught by teachers in the unbelieving group in prior years. We questioned the teachers in the unbelieving group about certain students. They confirmed that these students did nothing in their classes. We showed them the report cards for this year. These “do nothing” students were obtaining “B”s and even a few “A”s.

What is the difference? The teaching method made the difference. The students were allowed to learn. The students were encouraged to learn. All the gaps were filled and the students felt confident that they could learn. The “Do Nothing” students became achievers and even leaders.

Formative Assessment works, when implemented properly. It is the responsibility of the educational leaders (Rector, Dean, Head Master, Principal or Director) to evaluate the belief system of the teachers. The belief system and the attitude towards change will determine the success of the implementation.

As you have probably already guessed, we had to dismiss some of the teaching staff and bring in new personnel. We have been working on a questionnaire which will help us to eliminate the candidates which do not whole heartily believe in the benefits of Formative Assessment or who are resistant to change. Thankfully, all the teachers who were implementing Formative Assessment properly are still with us.

Formative Assessment provides an additional benefit; not only do student learn more and learn it better, but discipline problems drop substantially and because there are fewer problems and happier students, the teachers are happier, more content with their positions and their life in the school.

Formative Assessment works, when used properly! If you would like more information about Formative Assessment contact www.we-develop-leaders.com. If you would like to have you staff evaluated and train in Formative Assessment contact www.we-develop-leaders.com or info@we-develop-leaders.com .

Unique Leaders Educational Leadership Development prides itself on helping educational institutes around the world to produce better students; students who are competent in all areas, ready to meet the challenges of life. Contact us today.

All rights reserved. Reprints by permissions only. © 2005 Unique Leaders
www.we-develop-leaders.com www.uniqueleaders.org

References:

Borko, H. , Davinroy, K. H., Bliem, C. L., & Cumbo, K. B. (2000). Exploring and supporting teacher change: Two third-grade teachers’experiences in a mathematics and literacy staff development project. Elementary School Journal, 100 (4).

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29 (7),1-14.

member sign in New User  
email password  
go
remember me  forgot your password?  
Teachade Store
Bookmark and Share
FAQscontact usHome
Click Here